From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-13 13:44:34
"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> wrote
> It is very important to us that Boost.Python continues to work with
> gcc's. Would it be possible to find a solution to this problem? E.g. could
> is_abstract be ifdef'ed out on compilers where it doesn't work?
I suggested new Boost.Config macro (e.g. BOOST_NO_SUPPORT_FOR_DR337) which
could be used for this purpose.
List of compilers supporting (and not supporting) DR337 is in
is_abstract.hpp header but some are missing, e.g. Metrowerks and Unix
compilers with EDG front-end.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk