Re: [boost] Re: libs/iterator/test/Jamfile problem? [was: RC_1_31 regressiontest problem]

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-13 20:34:17

At 05:54 PM 1/13/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
 >Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
 >
 >> At 10:52 AM 1/13/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
 >>
 >>  >Might be fixed now; I hope so, anyway.
 >>
 >> Partially. The error disappeared, but the libs/iterator/example
 >> results aren't being reported in the status tables. There is no
 >> subinclude for them in status/Jamfile, which is how the status table
 >> program know where to look. How did they run at all?
 >
 >They're subincluded from libs/iterator/test.  This sort of thing is
 >why I objected to parsing the Jamfile.
 >
 >> I can change the paths searched in compiler_status.cpp, or a
 >> subinclude can be placed in status/Jamfile.
 >
 >Your choice I guess.

Well, sooner or later Boost.Build V2 will be ready, and we can ask it to 
directly generate the xml files (or better yet, one large xml file). Then 
we can abandon processing the bjam output.

In the meantime, it should work right away if you subinclude from 
status/Jamfile. At least I hope so.

--Beman