[boost] Re: libs/iterator/test/Jamfile problem? [was: RC_1_31 regressiontest problem]

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-14 00:05:28

Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> At 05:54 PM 1/13/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>  >Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
>  >
>  >> At 10:52 AM 1/13/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>  >>
>  >>  >Might be fixed now; I hope so, anyway.
>  >>
>  >> Partially. The error disappeared, but the libs/iterator/example
>  >> results aren't being reported in the status tables. There is no
>  >> subinclude for them in status/Jamfile, which is how the status table
>  >> program know where to look. How did they run at all?
>  >
>  >They're subincluded from libs/iterator/test.  This sort of thing is
>  >why I objected to parsing the Jamfile.
>  >
>  >> I can change the paths searched in compiler_status.cpp, or a
>  >> subinclude can be placed in status/Jamfile.
>  >
>  >Your choice I guess.
>
> Well, sooner or later Boost.Build V2 will be ready, and we can ask it
> to directly generate the xml files (or better yet, one large xml
> file). Then we can abandon processing the bjam output.

We can do it with v1 too, you know.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com