[boost] Re: Re: Re: move_ptr

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-21 11:57:42

"Daniel Wallin" <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:400EA228.4000202_at_student.umu.se...
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:

> >>If adding a template parameter is absolutely essential, we'll end
up
> >>with a half-baked smart_ptr<> and we could just as well spell
> >>move_ptr<>:
> >>
> >>    smart_ptr<T, move_semantics, array_storage>
> >>    smart_ptr<T, move_semantics, scalar_storage>
> >>
> >

One more thought: any idea when will smart_ptr will be fully baked?
;-)

Jonathan