Re: [boost] Re: Re: move_ptr

From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-21 19:13:34

Daniel James wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:01:56 +0100, Daniel Wallin wrote:
> 
> 
>>Please present _real_ common use cases where this is needed,
>>and where move_ptr can't be replaced with shared_ptr.
> 
> 
> How about writing wrappers around C libraries which return pointers? You
> always need a custom deleter for that. Of course, you could use a
> shared_ptr, but Howard Hinnant's example (for implementing shared_ptr) is
> possibly the only case when that isn't true.

OK, agreed.

-- 
Daniel Wallin