From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-22 12:12:36
At 09:54 AM 1/22/2004, Deane Yang wrote:
>Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> There was widespread agreement that no solution requiring pi() would
>> be widely acceptable.
>I'm sorry if my recollection is incorrect, but I only remember seeing
>messages from you stating this. I do not remember seeing anyone else
>on the boost mailing list expressing this view.
My recollection is the same as Paul's. There was a strong preference
expressed for pi rather than pi(). The discussions took place a long time
ago during the original review of Paul's library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk