|
Boost : |
From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-23 06:57:04
"Ken Hagan" <K.Hagan_at_[hidden]> wrote
> As I recall, someone from Fermilab claimed that they had tried
> the pi() syntax, but the end-users (your average scientific
> programmer) just wouldn't use a constant that looked like it had
> function call overheads.
Of course if you wanted to do math::compute_pi<my_big_num>();
:-)
regards
Andy Little
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk