From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-25 13:37:07
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 01:11:17 +0100, Andy Little wrote:
>> > pqs is not like YANL !
>> Of course. This is why I tried to keep the constant library independent
>> of a concrete unit library and provide a basic mechanism to support
>> certain type-mappings that are needed for all unit libraries.
> Yep. If it can be done it will be good... but there are many ways it can
> That is the only concern I have. We shall see...
I uploaded the example to the files section, please have a look. As you
will see, I had to modify your operator* in mul_scalar.hpp, of course the
other operators need to be aware of the constant library as well. I think
this is no problem when we agree that the constant library is a
prerequisit of your unit library ;) Honestly, I think we have to think
about this, as I am not yet sure whether we can find some general rules
that everyone can follow to make arbitrary libraries compatible and
independent of each other. Thoughts?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk