Re: [boost] Re: [administrative] Formal Review Process

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-27 00:46:38

Jens,

Jens Maurer wrote:
> 
> David Abrahams wrote:
> 
>> Thomas and I discussed both options (I think [review] would be a more
>> appropriate tag).  The thing I like about the mailing list is that
>> review commentary has a value all its own, and it would be great to be
>> able to search reviews separately. 
> 
> 
> Just to clarify: The "boost-review" list would be for review requests
> only, the actual review still happening on the main boost list?

My idea was to have it on the review list.

> 
> Discussion on the library itself should probably not be fractioned
> into the regular boost discussion and boost-review.

Why?

Thomas

Boost Review Wizard