Re: [boost] Re: [administrative] Formal Review Process

From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-25 17:11:41

David Abrahams wrote:
> Thomas and I discussed both options (I think [review] would be a more
> appropriate tag).  The thing I like about the mailing list is that
> review commentary has a value all its own, and it would be great to be
> able to search reviews separately. 

Just to clarify: The "boost-review" list would be for review requests
only, the actual review still happening on the main boost list?

Discussion on the library itself should probably not be fractioned
into the regular boost discussion and boost-review.

Jens Maurer