From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-06 03:11:18
Misha Bergal wrote:
> Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>Misha Bergal wrote:
>>>utility - operators_test / msvc-stlport
>>The regressions for 1.31.0-rc3 posted at <http://tinyurl.com/3fde7>
>>looked good, as did the other regression tests for RC_1_31_0 and
>>HEAD. Any idea what happened?
> I don't have a definite answer. One probable cause is that the
> regressions for 1.31.0-rc3 and RC_1_31_0 were run on different
> The crucial difference might be in that the machine which ran
> 1.31.0-rc3 is significanly slower. Our build monitor is programmed to
> terminate any test which runs for more than 100 seconds. And that's
> what might have happened with this test.
OK, so I think we should keep an eye on it whether or not it happens
again. If the test needs to be split up into smaller chunks to run
faster, let me know.
-- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial solutions & technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk