[boost] Re: future of boost.threads

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-07 16:49:15

Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
> Kind of unrelated but I thought I'd ask here as the original author of
> this thread lib is among the missing.  I'd like to create a basic condvar
> implementation for the (windows version of the) D programming language and
> obviously don't want to have to invent one from scratch.  Is there another
> good implementation in the public domain or is the boost version it?  And
> if I used the boost implementation as a template, would it be
> necessary and sufficient for me to include the copyright notice?  It would
> be a total rewrite, but I'd still consider it a derivative work of
> whatever it was based on.

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/pthreads-win32/2004/msg00005.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/pthreads-win32/2004/msg00007.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/pthreads-win32/2004/msg00008.html

regards,
alexander.