From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-09 09:57:47
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:28:08 -0500, David Abrahams wrote
>> Because we don't have the luxury of an extra compilation stage like
>> Corba does. There's no way to stop unwinding with catch(...), store
>> whatever arbitrary exception object was thrown, and then rethrow it later.
> Corba doesn't really solve the problem with compilation, it just makes it
> easier for the user by generating binding code.
Code generation == an extra compilation stage.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk