[boost] Re: any smart pointer alternative suggestions?

From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn-mycop_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-11 15:58:14

Trey Jackson wrote:

> The issue is that the smart pointers assume the pointer type to be
> 'T*', which is fine on a 32-bit system, but means that we get a near
> doubling of run-time size on our application when we move to a 64-bit
> application.
> 
far/near pointers model returns! ;-)
-- 
Alexander Nasonov
Independent Developer and Consultant