From: Matthew Vogt (mvogt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-17 20:58:58
Brian McNamara <lorgon <at> cc.gatech.edu> writes:
> Monads depend on lambda; in my opinion, over the long term, I think
> monads will be the main "selling point" that makes it worth keeping
> fcpp::lambda around in addition to boost::lambda.
Couple of questions:
What are the features of fcpp::lambda that monads depend on, that boost::lambda
does not provide?
Are these features not able to be implemented in boost::lambda (given the
current design), if that were desirable?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk