[boost] Re: FC++: lambda

From: Matthew Vogt (mvogt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-17 20:58:58

Brian McNamara <lorgon <at> cc.gatech.edu> writes:

> Monads depend on lambda; in my opinion, over the long term, I think
> monads will be the main "selling point" that makes it worth keeping
> fcpp::lambda around in addition to boost::lambda.  
> 

Couple of questions:

What are the features of fcpp::lambda that monads depend on, that boost::lambda
does not provide?

Are these features not able to be implemented in boost::lambda (given the 
current design), if that were desirable? 

Thanks
Matt