RE: [boost] Re: FC++ Formal review half way over today (ends 2/23)

From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-18 18:19:52

Would it be possible to extend the formal review of FC++ one week,
considering it is an almost complete formal workspace for solving problems?
[This also touches at one of the problems with it...]

I have had some time to use it in a project of mine (#ifdef:ed to switch
back to good old STL+Boost...) and love it, but ... I am not sure whether it
fits the goals of Boost? And, I am a Haskell developer, as well, so I might
be biased.

So, if there is any chance of extending the review, this particular
functional guy would be happy...

/David