From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-20 03:26:51
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> At 01:54 PM 2/19/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
> >"Paul A Bristow" <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> A tiny typographic nitpick - Would it lie on the page more neatly as:
> >> // Copyright I M Booster 2002-2004.
> >> // Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
> >> // (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt
> >> // or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
> >Maybe. I was not trying to suggest, nor do I think I'd want to
> >mandate, any particular use of line breaks in the comment.
> I second that. While Paul's choice of line breaks was a bit prettier,
> that's the sort of thing we traditionally leave up to the developer.
How about the copyright line? Should that always appear with the
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.581 / Virus Database: 368 - Release Date: 2/9/2004
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk