[boost] Re: Re: Proposed change to license references

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-20 03:26:51

"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4.3.2.7.2.20040219145425.031c90a0_at_mailhost.esva.net...
> At 01:54 PM 2/19/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>  >"Paul A Bristow" <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>  >
>  >> A tiny typographic nitpick - Would it lie on the page more neatly as:
>  >>
>  >> // Copyright I M Booster 2002-2004.
>  >> // Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
>  >> // (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt
>  >> // or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
>  >
>  >Maybe.  I was not trying to suggest, nor do I think I'd want to
>  >mandate, any particular use of line breaks in the comment.
>
> I second that. While Paul's choice of line breaks was a bit prettier,
> that's the sort of thing we traditionally leave up to the developer.

How about the copyright line?  Should that always appear with the
license notice?

Dave

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.581 / Virus Database: 368 - Release Date: 2/9/2004