From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-20 07:37:13
"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> At 01:54 PM 2/19/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>> >"Paul A Bristow" <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >> A tiny typographic nitpick - Would it lie on the page more neatly as:
>> >> // Copyright I M Booster 2002-2004.
>> >> // Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
>> >> // (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt
>> >> // or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
>> >Maybe. I was not trying to suggest, nor do I think I'd want to
>> >mandate, any particular use of line breaks in the comment.
>> I second that. While Paul's choice of line breaks was a bit prettier,
>> that's the sort of thing we traditionally leave up to the developer.
> How about the copyright line? Should that always appear with the
> license notice?
I don't have an opinion. Any reason why not? What does "with"
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk