From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-24 20:29:16
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Powell, Gary wrote:
>> For me it's a matter of future expansion, and maintenance, we have
>> boost::bind, and boost::lambda::bind, and perhaps soon
>> boost:fcpp::lambda which is the namespace which the function? If we
>> use apprev. 4 everythg, thn, we lose contx.
> No we do not. The abbrv anlgy is flwd. It's more like English::this
> English::kind English::of English::writing versus en::this en::alternative
Believe it or not the latter caused me a bigger mental hiccup.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk