Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-24 20:40:34

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: win32.hpp and min/max macros"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: algorithms namespace"
In reply to: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] [python] separating the "C++ exposing" part?"
Next in thread: Daryle Walker: "A new list? (was: Re: [boost][python] separating the "C++ exposing" part?)"
Reply: Daryle Walker: "A new list? (was: Re: [boost][python] separating the "C++ exposing" part?)"

"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> writes:

> It was suggested some time ago by Daniel Wallin
> to refactor part of Boost.Python generating class
> description into separate library. The result could be
> reused by Luabind.
>
> Is such separation possible and technically feasible at all?
>
> It may find use to implement RTTI-like mechanism,
> e.g. for GUI toolkits.

Pavel,

Please join us on the boost-langbinding mailing list, where these
issues are discussed.

Cheers,

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: win32.hpp and min/max macros"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: algorithms namespace"
In reply to: Pavel Vozenilek: "[boost] [python] separating the "C++ exposing" part?"
Next in thread: Daryle Walker: "A new list? (was: Re: [boost][python] separating the "C++ exposing" part?)"
Reply: Daryle Walker: "A new list? (was: Re: [boost][python] separating the "C++ exposing" part?)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk