[boost] Re: Proposed change to license references

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-26 18:24:39

Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:22:12 -0500, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>[change reference comment] to:
>>
>>  // Distributed under the Boost
>>  // Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file
>>  // LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>I'm posting this now to give people a chance to come up with any other
>>issues -- **with the license reference comment**, not the license
>>itself -- that may need to be addressed before we make a change.  If
>>there are no new issues within a week or so, we'll make it official.
>
> One thing occurred to me yesterday. Is that comment ok for files that
> are in the CVS repository? In a sense, they are not "distributed",
> just made available. What do you think?

The CVS server or webserver (CVSWeb) distributes them.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com