[boost] Re: Formal review queue

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-26 18:00:21

Jonathan,

Please use standard quoting so we can tell which parts of the posting
are yours and which are Jeff's

"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message:
>
> <review queue snipped>
>
> Wow, this is scary.  We have an awful lot of work that is piling up.
> On top
> of that, the fcpp review is awfully quiet...
>
> I believe Robert Ramey might have asked for a second review of
> serialization,
> although I can't find it in the mail archive at the moment.  If I'm
> correct,
> maybe that review should be given special priority over some of the
> new libs,
> or a shortened re-review process?
>
> Robert Ramey requested a review on Jan 23 of this year. I thought I
> had seen a review request for serialization last fall, but I don't see
> it in my saved messages.
>
> Anyway, as the author of one of the above libraries, I'd be happy to
> let serialization go first. I know a lot of people (including me) are
> looking forward to it.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com