Re: [boost] full functoids

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-29 08:20:02

On 2/20/04 2:35 PM, "Douglas Paul Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian McNamara wrote:
>> I dunno if/what the plans are for a Boost "result_of" implementation
>> (Doug?), but that will be the keystone library component to this end, I
>> think.
> 
> A couple more whacks of the boot and I'll finally bring this in. It's been
> languishing in the sandbox for way too long. The major sticking point (and
> it's a boring one) is that I need to put in workarounds for broken
> compilers. I *hate* putting in workarounds for broken compilers.

Then don't.  You don't have to put in workarounds (unless _your_ compiler
needs them).  If someone complains, they can fix the code on their time.
(They should let you know first, though.)

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com