From: Guillaume Melquiond (guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-01 11:27:36
Le lun 01/03/2004 à 16:58, Beman Dawes a écrit :
> Looking at the results, there is lots of good news. Tests now passing,
> warnings removed, etc. But there are also regressions in a number of
> Interval - Borland, VC++ 6.0, and VC++ 7.0 regressions.
I already reported these failures to the list two weeks ago so that
anybody interested could take a look. There were no answer so the
library has been marked as unusable with these compilers in the
status/explicit-failures-markup.xml. It doesn't appear in your
regression logs; but in Metacomm's summaries it appears clearly.
> Hopefully the developers will take a look at these soon so the regressions
> don't hang around until the next release.
I don't intend to fix them. The library doesn't use any complex C++
construction (even Borland 5.5 is able to compile it), I'm not fond of
trying to workaround any strange bug a compiler may have.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk