RE: [boost] Re: boost::any: explicit constructor?

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-01 16:05:10

At Saturday 2004-02-28 21:06, you wrote:
>I wrote:
> > >That is why we should always use "covariant" and "contravariant"
>
>Victor responded:
> > oh yeah, covariant and contravariant are pellucidly clear
> > </extreme sarcasm> they also differ by only 3 letters (in the
> > middle) and are hard to read
>
>Actually the start tag of the "extreme sarcasm" element started around two
>lines above your reply ;-)

PtL!
I guess I shouldn't have taken that speed reading class, I sped right past 
it. :)

>/David
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"