From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-02 11:51:32
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:28:25 -0800, Robert Ramey wrote
> 1 more question? Hmmm so for I have received submissions for serialization
> of optional, scoped_ptr, date_time library among others. These are
> from people who needed to serialize other boost objects that they
> use. I've stopped incorporating them as the library is getting too
> big for me to manage. If this library is ever accepted,
> serialization of boost components will have to be a responsibility
> separate from the serialization library itself. After, they are
> really applications of the serialization library rathet than
> components of the library.
I agree that the serialization for items like date-time should be part of
date-time and not serialization. I was planning on working on the changes
for date-time as part of my 'evaluation' of the new serialization.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk