Re: [boost] Re:Re: serialization library #17

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-02 11:51:32

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:28:25 -0800, Robert Ramey wrote

> 1 more question? Hmmm so for I have received submissions for serialization
> of optional, scoped_ptr, date_time library among others. These are 
> from people who needed to serialize other boost objects that they 
> use. I've stopped incorporating them as the library is getting too 
> big for me to manage.  If this library is ever accepted, 
> serialization of boost components will have to be a responsibility 
> separate from the serialization library itself. After, they are 
> really applications of the serialization library rathet than 
> components of the library.

I agree that the serialization for items like date-time should be part of 
date-time and not serialization.  I was planning on working on the changes 
for date-time as part of my 'evaluation' of the new serialization. 

Jeff