[boost] Re: Implicitly-Callable Functions in C++0x?

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-11 19:34:17

"Paul A Bristow" <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:001501c40795$ce631ce0$0c010101_at_hetp3...
> >From a very quick study of this, this radical proposal avoids nasty
> brackets "pi()" by adding a new C++ keyword implicit to make "pi" have
> the same effect.

Considering what Daniel can do, I don't think the math constant part of the
proposal brings anything.

br

Thorsten