From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-13 12:57:06
"Javier Estrada" <ljestrada_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> A couple of weeks ago I posted in c++ moderated:
> It seems natural that if there is a <iosfwd> to forward declare the
> related classes, there should be a header for the classes contained
> std namespace.
I think comp.std.c++ is where you should post this.
I'd also like to have a facility for forward declaring names in std;
it should definitely be more fine-grained than <stdfwd>, though. Why
not have <xxxfwd> headers for standard headers <xxx> not currently
covered by <iosfwd>?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk