From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-13 22:24:29
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:57:06 -0700, Jonathan Turkanis wrote
> "Javier Estrada" <ljestrada_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > A couple of weeks ago I posted in c++ moderated:
> > It seems natural that if there is a <iosfwd> to forward declare the
> > related classes, there should be a header for the classes contained
> in the
> > std namespace.
> I think comp.std.c++ is where you should post this.
> I'd also like to have a facility for forward declaring names in std;
> it should definitely be more fine-grained than <stdfwd>, though. Why
> not have <xxxfwd> headers for standard headers <xxx> not currently
> covered by <iosfwd>?
You might be interested in this email thread where this topic was previously
Turns out you are right to go to comp.std.c++ because the current standard
basically precludes this. Of course, I'll be happy to post my attempt at this
if you want to use it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk