From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-13 14:43:06
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:24:04 -0500, David Abrahams
>Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> [two new header files:]
>> a) http://tinyurl.com/36zsj
>> b) http://tinyurl.com/2lb26
>> I think they provide two useful facilities in themselves. Would it be
>> ok to commit them in the boost/ folder? Or should they belong to
>> boost/detail/? Or maybe boost/pending/?
>If they're going into boost/, they need to be documented. THat's the
>only constraint, IMO.
Oh, no problem for that. But where the docs go? I mean: they are not a
"library" in themselves; and "utility" seems too much an easy
collector for everything :)
PS: should I also ask for a mini-review?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk