From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-11 21:34:14
Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> [two new header files:]
>>> a) http://tinyurl.com/36zsj
>>> b) http://tinyurl.com/2lb26
>>> I think they provide two useful facilities in themselves. Would it be
>>> ok to commit them in the boost/ folder? Or should they belong to
>>> boost/detail/? Or maybe boost/pending/?
>>If they're going into boost/, they need to be documented. THat's the
>>only constraint, IMO.
> Oh, no problem for that. But where the docs go? I mean: they are not a
> "library" in themselves; and "utility" seems too much an easy
> collector for everything :)
These look to me like they should be part of
> PS: should I also ask for a mini-review?
Or at least consult Darlye Walker.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk