From: Peter Palotas (peter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-17 09:31:57
> >>> peter_at_[hidden] 03/16/04 03:49PM >>> wrote:
> > I was wondering if there is any interest in a container that is a
> > model of sequence (just like std::vector or std::list) and with an
> > interface matching that of std::vector (maybe with minor
> > due to efficiency) but with different time complexities?
> On a related note, all the basic associative containers could
> (and arguably should) have an "nth_element" method with
> complexity O(log(n)). With this interface addition a
> container with an interface like vector but complexity like
> map could be adapted from map akin to the way queue is
> adapted from deque.
Are you suggesting a change in the implementation of the standard sorted
associative containers? I'm not sure that would be a good idea, since
maintaining information in them to find the nth element in O(log n) time
would add an overhead to insert/delete operations which would be undesirable
if you don't need that functionality, which in fact I think you normally
Just a thought.
// Peter Palotas
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk