[boost] Re: mem_fn warnings

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-18 17:52:48

Peter Dimov <pdimov <at> mmltd.net> writes:

> I suspect I can do much better in a hypothetical 100% TR1 bind that only
> targets 100% conforming compilers (and can freely use other TR1 libraries).
> But what would the point be? Isn't Lambda supposed to fill that role? 

Maybe so, but in my recent experiences, even though error messages are bad, 
bind/mem_fn turns out to be generally *able* to solve the programming problems 
I encounter, whereas every time I've tried to apply lambda I've dropped it 
after running into a wall :(

-Dave