From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-18 20:25:16
Hurd, Matthew wrote:
> Being able to have zero overhead for compiling it outta-there and having
> enabling and disabling at run-time would be nice. The other thing I'd
> like is having support for stack viewing which I've used in the past for
> helping with production support.
Yes, stack tracing would be a great option. We did discuss this here
before, and someone even posted some usable sample code.
I guess everyone needs logging, and it sounds like many have hacked together
their own solutions. I've seen a number of log4j ish projects. Perhaps
one represents the best of the art and might be ported to boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk