From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-22 01:37:25
> I'm definitely worried that relative_to() as proposed would come to be
> viewed as fragile.
Yup, you're right.
> This is similar to the path equality issue. We are dealing with that
> by introducing class path relational operators, working at a lexical
> level, and a function equivalent() which actually performs filesystem
> operations to determine if two paths refer to the same underlying object.
Aha... I'll grab the latest version from CVS. But I guess with this
equivalent() function, it should be possible to implement it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk