Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-22 19:19:09

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: borland-5.6.4, auo_link and common-names (v1)"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [program_options] post-review version"
In reply to: Carl Daniel: "[boost] Re: Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Next in thread: John Torjo: "Re: [boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Reply: John Torjo: "Re: [boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"

"Carl Daniel" <cpdaniel_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Adal Chiriliuc wrote:
>
>> Wasn't event usage discouraged because it is unsafe?
>
> That was semaphores.

IIRC Windows Events have safety problems too.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: borland-5.6.4, auo_link and common-names (v1)"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [program_options] post-review version"
In reply to: Carl Daniel: "[boost] Re: Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Next in thread: John Torjo: "Re: [boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"
Reply: John Torjo: "Re: [boost] Re: [Threads] Much faster try_mutex on Windows NT"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk