Boost logo

Boost :

From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-23 07:52:00


Miro Jurisic wrote:
> In article <uekrke8bn.fsf_at_[hidden]>,
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>>I see no reason to use names longer than those suggested below.
>
>
>>> BOOST_BORLAND
>>> BOOST_COMEAU
>>> BOOST_GNU (1)
>>> BOOST_INTEL
>>> BOOST_MSVC (2)
>
>
> I would suggest using BOOST_CC_* or BOOST_COMPILER_*, to avoid possible
> ambiguities. For instance, BOOST_INTEL in and of itself does not make it clear
> whether it denotes a compiler-specific kludge or an architecture-specific kludge.

I second this. In addition to being more consistent and eliminating
possible ambiguities, it would also make it much easier to search for
compiler-specific patches.

Mike


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk