Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-30 10:48:09

From: "Reece Dunn" <msclrhd_at_[hidden]>
> So the errorcheck object will be in a half-constructed state. That is, the
> int will be constructed, but the errorcheck object isn't, therefore the
> int's destructor will be called, but errorcheck's deconstructor will not.
> The solution would therefore be to throw an intermediate object, like the
> Trules from the C++ Templates book by David Vandervoorde and Nico Josuttis.
> This would then get around the throwing in a constructor problem.

Why not throw a new errorcheck object using a private ctor that
stores but doesn't check the return value?

Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer           
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at