From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-07 15:45:23
"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Careful, Dave. In general, metaprogramming doesn't need to use
>> types as its underlying computation mechanism.
> Right. C++ could allow mutable values at compile time to enable
> metaprogramming, whilst leaving the types immutable.
>> In fact, I predict that if support for concepts is built into C++ we will
>> eventually run out of rope even for the things we do today with TMP
>> and we will *need* a new approach. I sure hope that approach
>> can look more like regular C++ programming than TMP does.
> Why wait? Maybe we should start designing a new approach right
> now. ;>
I hope to work with Daveed Vandevoorde on his metacode effort at some
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk