Re: [boost] Re: Date-Time documentation link

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-07 15:50:25

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 15:42:54 -0400, Edward Diener wrote

> > Acutally, it has only static functions to return local and UTC day.
> Didn't
> > seem worth it's own page in the documentation for 2 functions...
> 
> Yes, of course. I should have said "static" and not member 
> functions. I still think when you take such shortcuts, you need to 
> explain it.

Sure.  I'll enhance the documentation to point this out.

> While I have your attention, here is a doc bug in the 1.31 doc for
> date/time.If you look at the documentation for ptime, in the section
> regarding construction from Clock ( in which I assume that 
> second_clock is like day_clock with no explicit doc for itself ),
>  the syntax and example for the second table entry is out of sync as 
> far as the name of the static class function. It should probably be 
> "universal_time" but the example has "universal_day" instead.

Thx.  Will fix shortly.  Someone also just pointed out that the microsecond
clock is not listed on the ptime page.  Which means that it's almost to the
point that the clock stuff needs it's own page ;-)

Jeff