|
Boost : |
From: Miro Jurisic (macdev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-07 16:54:15
In article <c51m6l$edg$1_at_[hidden]>,
"Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I am referring to this line in the doc under 'Using nested binds for function
> composition':
>
> "Note that the first argument - the bound function object - is not evaluated,
> even when it's a function object that is produced by bind or a placeholder
> argument, so the example below does not work as expected."
I am pretty sure that's worded very poorly. The argument has to be evaluated, in
the sense that functions get called, code gets executed. However, I am not sure
that I can suggest a better wording without understanding details of the
implementation, which I have so far managed to avoid :-)
meeroh
-- If this message helped you, consider buying an item from my wish list: <http://web.meeroh.org/wishlist>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk