From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-15 13:22:28
"John Torjo" <john.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote
> >The complexity, though, is in processing which happens after the message
> >send to logger -- checking when message should be printed, adding
> >timestamps, writing to files/syslog, etc.
> True. I looked at log4j (for the nth time ;)) I don't like it. It's way
> too complex.
> There's no need for Filter, Layout and a lot of other classes (IMHO).
> What I want is to create a simple correspondence from a log_id (a level)
> into a log function.
Maybe it is possible to design a library which has (by default) this
simple interface but allows very fine customization.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk