Re: [boost] Re: Re: logging library?

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-16 01:07:02

Pavel Vozenilek wrote:

>"John Torjo" <john.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote
>
>  
>
>>>The complexity, though, is in processing which happens after the message
>>>      
>>>
>is
>  
>
>>>send to logger -- checking when message should be printed, adding
>>>timestamps, writing to files/syslog, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>True. I looked at log4j (for the nth time ;)) I don't like it. It's way
>>too complex.
>>
>>There's no need for Filter, Layout and a lot of other classes (IMHO).
>>
>>What I want is to create a simple correspondence from a log_id (a level)
>>into a log function.
>>
>>    
>>
>Maybe it is possible to design a library which has (by default) this
>simple interface but allows very fine customization.
>
>  
>
That's exactly what I want to do :)
Since there seems to be some interest, I'll start working on it in the 
very near future.

Best,
John