|
|
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-20 07:42:20
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:13:20 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote
> Of course, the above is just syntactic sugar and not really required
> (but hey, it's cool, isn't it :). And FWIW I often use fixed dates
> in my code when punching together some test data.
Sure it's cool, until you have to write the docs and explain a feature to
average programmers, twice -- since there is the ET way and the normal way.
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk