Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-20 20:46:11

"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> writes:

> There's another point that has me a little bit stumped. Most of the boost
> libraries are code that one invokes with a documented signature. The list
> of invocations, syntax and semantics is what I think Vladimir is referring
> to here with "reference documentation". However, the serialization library
> is more "upside down" in that using it consists almost entirely of filling
> in stubs called by the serialization algorithm. So its not clear to me how
> the "reference documentation" would look compared to the current documents.

That's usually done by describing concept requirements of the
parameters to the serialization algorithm. See
for an example.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at