From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-20 20:41:48
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>> IIRC these support bind<R&>(&X::r, _1). Comment them out for cw8
>>>> and see if anything breaks. :-)
>>> Nothing breaks. I just assumed you didn't ahve any tests for that
>>> case. And I had worked out this whole complicated patch. Waste of
>>> I assume you will apply the __MWERKS__ disablers?
> Please apply them yourself, as you are the one with cwpro8 (and 9). I'm
> reluctant to apply patches when I can't test them, no matter how trivial.
I don't have 9 since my beta license expired and a new one hasn't
arrived from MW yet. I could just turn those overloads off for all
__MWERKS__ if a conforming compiler shouldn't need them. Is that
what you had in mind?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk