From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-21 10:01:56
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I don't have 9 since my beta license expired and a new one hasn't
>> arrived from MW yet. I could just turn those overloads off for all
>> __MWERKS__ if a conforming compiler shouldn't need them. Is that
>> what you had in mind?
> No, no. The overloads are required to support
> bind<int&>( &X::i, _1 )(x) = 5;
> but this is not a critical feature (which is why there are no tests
> for it),
I object. We should at least be trying to test everything.
> so there isn't much harm if we disable it for CW8. But we shouldn't
> disable it for CW9+ if there's no need. FWIW, my evaluation license
> for CW9.2 expired, too. ;-)
I'm waiting for MWerks to send me a regular copy of pro9, which I had
to ask for explicitly.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk