[boost] Re: bind question/request

From: Maxim Khesin (gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-02 12:28:37

Daniel Wallin wrote:
> Max Khesin wrote:
> [snip]
> 
>> and by extension
>> bind(f, _1, _2, _0)(x, y, z)
>> would be equivalent to
>> f(x, y)
> 
> 
> I don't get it, what is _0 here? AFAICT
> 
>   bind(f, _1, _2)(x, y, z)
> 
> is already the equivalent of
> 
>   f(x, y)
> 
ok, I guessed that I was missing something. Thanks Daniel, I'll go check 
it out!