Re: [boost] Re: calling bind with literals

From: jajarvi (jajarvi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-06 21:28:24

On May 6, 2004, at 8:50 PM, David Abrahams wrote:

>
> I agree.  IMO the best answer for now is to generate the 2^N overloads
> of operator() for some user-selectable N.  Unary and binary functions
> are so common that IMO usually N==2 will do it.
>

This is the way to go for now, and will cover 99% of the cases, or more.
But we should not start feeling two content with the situation, the 
forwarding
problem still needs to get solved at the language level :)

   Jaakko