From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-07 06:05:58
jajarvi <jajarvi_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On May 6, 2004, at 8:50 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
>> I agree. IMO the best answer for now is to generate the 2^N overloads
>> of operator() for some user-selectable N. Unary and binary functions
>> are so common that IMO usually N==2 will do it.
> This is the way to go for now, and will cover 99% of the cases, or
> more. But we should not start feeling two content with the
> situation, the forwarding problem still needs to get solved at the
> language level :)
I guess you missed the big stink I made about that in Sydney?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk