[boost] Re: calling bind with literals

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-07 06:05:58

jajarvi <jajarvi_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On May 6, 2004, at 8:50 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree.  IMO the best answer for now is to generate the 2^N overloads
>> of operator() for some user-selectable N.  Unary and binary functions
>> are so common that IMO usually N==2 will do it.
>>
>
> This is the way to go for now, and will cover 99% of the cases, or
> more.  But we should not start feeling two content with the
> situation, the forwarding problem still needs to get solved at the
> language level :)

I guess you missed the big stink I made about that in Sydney?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com